Liberian vs Italian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Liberian
Italian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Liberians
Italians
19.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
253rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Liberian vs Italian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,632,985 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.103 and weighted average of 19.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 553,398,049 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.511 and weighted average of 14.2%, a difference of 35.7%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Liberian | Italian |
Minimum | 0.35% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 52.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 52.5% | 98.9% |
Mean | 19.8% | 16.8% |
Median | 18.6% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.2% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.3% | 14.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.0% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.1% | 21.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.0% | 20.9% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Liberians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Immigrants from Western Africa (19.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (19.3%, a difference of 0.27%), Ecuadorian (19.3%, a difference of 0.27%), French American Indian (19.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Liberia (19.3%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 19.0% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 19.0% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 19.0% |
Alsatians | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 19.1% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 19.2% |
French American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 19.3% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 19.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 19.3% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.4% |
Demographics Similar to Italians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Immigrants from Greece (14.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Czech (14.1%, a difference of 0.49%), Immigrants from Indonesia (14.1%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Moldova (14.1%, a difference of 0.59%), and Laotian (14.3%, a difference of 0.82%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.4 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Italians | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Laotians | 99.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Poles | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |