Laotian vs Italian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Laotian
Italian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Laotians
Italians
14.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian vs Italian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,108,732 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.630 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 553,398,049 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.511 and weighted average of 14.2%, a difference of 0.82%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Laotian | Italian |
Minimum | 0.40% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 90.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 89.9% | 98.9% |
Mean | 18.2% | 16.8% |
Median | 13.4% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.5% | 14.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.4% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.7% | 21.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.5% | 20.9% |
Demographics Similar to Laotians and Italians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Philippines (14.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Serbia (14.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Pakistan (14.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Zimbabwean (14.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Polish (14.4%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Immigrants from Greece (14.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Czech (14.1%, a difference of 0.49%), Immigrants from Indonesia (14.1%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Moldova (14.1%, a difference of 0.59%), and Greek (14.1%, a difference of 0.86%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Koreans | 99.6 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.4 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Italians | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Laotians | 99.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Poles | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Scandinavians | 98.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 14.4% |