Latvian vs Norwegian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Latvian
Norwegian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Latvians
Norwegians
7.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
6th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Norwegian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,290,550 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.048 and weighted average of 7.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 529,824,258 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236 and weighted average of 6.9%, a difference of 2.8%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Latvian | Norwegian |
Minimum | 1.4% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 26.1% | 42.9% |
Range | 24.7% | 41.1% |
Mean | 6.7% | 7.2% |
Median | 6.0% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 7.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Norwegians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Bulgarian (7.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Singapore (7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Bhutanese (7.0%, a difference of 0.44%), Maltese (7.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and Swedish (7.1%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Ireland (7.0%, a difference of 1.4%), Bhutanese (7.0%, a difference of 2.3%), Bulgarian (7.1%, a difference of 3.0%), Immigrants from Singapore (7.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and Thai (6.7%, a difference of 3.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |