Cypriot vs Norwegian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Cypriot
Norwegian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Cypriots
Norwegians
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
6th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cypriot vs Norwegian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,784,976 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Cypriots and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.373 and weighted average of 7.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 529,824,258 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236 and weighted average of 6.9%, a difference of 6.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cypriot | Norwegian |
Minimum | 0.41% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 14.8% | 42.9% |
Range | 14.4% | 41.1% |
Mean | 5.8% | 7.2% |
Median | 5.6% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.9% | 7.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Cypriots and Norwegians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cypriots are Burmese (7.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Croatian (7.3%, a difference of 0.25%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (7.3%, a difference of 0.55%), Danish (7.3%, a difference of 0.56%), and Immigrants from Iran (7.3%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Ireland (7.0%, a difference of 1.4%), Bhutanese (7.0%, a difference of 2.3%), Latvian (7.1%, a difference of 2.8%), Bulgarian (7.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and Immigrants from Singapore (7.1%, a difference of 3.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |