Laotian vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Under the Age of 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,849,875 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.571 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 450,826,325 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.271 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 7.8%.

Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Laotian	Immigrants from China
Minimum	0.17%	1.6%
Maximum	78.1%	29.3%
Range	77.9%	27.7%
Mean	17.1%	11.7%
Median	13.8%	11.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	10.4%	8.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	19.1%	13.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.8%	5.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	14.1%	5.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	13.9%	5.0%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16

Demographics Similar to Laotians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16

In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Bulgaria (14.3%, a difference of 0.080%), European (14.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Slovene (14.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Netherlands (14.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Poland (14.3%, a difference of 0.18%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Immigrants \| Sweden	98.5 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 14.2%
Zimbabweans	98.5 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 14.2%
Immigrants \| Europe	98.4 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 14.2%
Immigrants \| Romania	98.3 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 14.2%
Immigrants \| Philippines	98.2 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 14.3%
Slovenes	98.1 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 14.3%
Europeans	98.1 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 14.3%
Laotians	98.0 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	98.0 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	97.9 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Poland	97.9 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 14.3%
Cambodians	97.8 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Turkey	97.6 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 14.4%
Macedonians	97.6 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 14.4%
Ukrainians	97.5 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 14.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16

In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Bolivian (13.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Swedish (13.3%, a difference of 0.42%), Eastern European (13.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and Turkish (13.4%, a difference of 0.72%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Okinawans	99.8 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 13.1%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	99.8 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 13.1%
Maltese	99.8 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 13.1%
Indians (Asian)	99.8 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 13.1%
Latvians	99.8 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 13.2%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 13.2%
Bolivians	99.8 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 13.2%
Immigrants \| China	99.8 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 13.3%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.7 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 13.3%
Swedes	99.7 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 13.3%
Turks	99.7 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 13.4%
Danes	99.7 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 13.4%
Tongans	99.7 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 13.4%
Asians	99.6 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 13.5%
Russians	99.6 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 13.5%