Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Immigrants from China
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Immigrants from China
13.8%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,197,772 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.197 and weighted average of 13.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 450,826,325 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.271 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 3.7%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Sri Lanka | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 0.87% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 40.1% | 29.3% |
Range | 39.2% | 27.7% |
Mean | 14.1% | 11.7% |
Median | 11.4% | 11.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.4% | 13.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.7% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Immigrants from Moldova (13.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Croatian (13.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Greek (13.8%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Scotland (13.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Australia (13.6%, a difference of 0.93%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Bolivian (13.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Swedish (13.3%, a difference of 0.42%), Eastern European (13.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and Turkish (13.4%, a difference of 0.72%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Tongans | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Asians | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Croatians | 99.4 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.3 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.3 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Greeks | 99.3 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 13.8% |