Jordanian vs Immigrants from Latvia Male Poverty
COMPARE
Jordanian
Immigrants from Latvia
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Jordanians
Immigrants from Latvia
10.4%
MALE POVERTY
94.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
92.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Immigrants from Latvia Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,386,715 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.209 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,727,577 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.012 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 0.73%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Jordanian | Immigrants from Latvia |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 30.3% | 40.7% |
| Range | 28.2% | 39.2% |
| Mean | 10.5% | 9.9% |
| Median | 9.2% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 7.2% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians and Immigrants from Latvia by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Australian (10.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from South Africa (10.4%, a difference of 0.17%), British (10.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Scottish (10.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Indian (Asian) (10.4%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Immigrants from Indonesia (10.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Finnish (10.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (10.5%, a difference of 0.29%), French Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.30%), and Romanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 95.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 95.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Cambodians | 95.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 94.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Jordanians | 94.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Australians | 94.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| French Canadians | 91.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Slavs | 91.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Canadians | 91.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.5% |