Immigrants from Denmark vs Immigrants from Latvia Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Denmark
Immigrants from Latvia
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Denmark
Immigrants from Latvia
10.4%
MALE POVERTY
95.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
92.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Denmark vs Immigrants from Latvia Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,389,161 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.573 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,727,577 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.012 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 1.0%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Denmark | Immigrants from Latvia |
Minimum | 4.0% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 40.2% | 40.7% |
Range | 36.2% | 39.2% |
Mean | 11.7% | 9.9% |
Median | 10.0% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.5% | 12.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 7.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Latvia by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Denmark are Cambodian (10.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Indian (Asian) (10.4%, a difference of 0.020%), British (10.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Northern European (10.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (10.4%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Immigrants from Indonesia (10.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Finnish (10.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (10.5%, a difference of 0.29%), French Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.30%), and Romanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Czechoslovakians | 95.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | England | 95.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 95.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Northern Europeans | 95.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Cambodians | 95.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 94.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.4% |
British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Jordanians | 94.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Australians | 94.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |
French Canadians | 91.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Slavs | 91.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.5% |