Iraqi vs Malaysian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Iraqi
Malaysian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Iraqis
Malaysians
13.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
31.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
193rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
7.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iraqi vs Malaysian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,556,869 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iraqis and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,983,571 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.162 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 4.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iraqi | Malaysian |
| Minimum | 0.62% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 26.1% | 38.2% |
| Range | 25.5% | 36.7% |
| Mean | 12.8% | 15.2% |
| Median | 12.5% | 14.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.0% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.1% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Iraqis and Malaysians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iraqis are Immigrants from Costa Rica (13.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Delaware (13.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kuwait (13.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from South America (13.7%, a difference of 0.12%), and South American Indian (13.7%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Panamanian (14.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Moroccan (14.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from the Azores (14.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (14.2%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (14.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 32.7 /100 | #191 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 31.9 /100 | #192 | Fair 13.7% |
| Iraqis | 31.8 /100 | #193 | Fair 13.7% |
| Delaware | 31.1 /100 | #194 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | South America | 30.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 13.7% |
| South American Indians | 28.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 13.7% |
| Arabs | 28.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 28.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 25.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.8% |
| Spanish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
| Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
| Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
| Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |