Immigrants from Uganda vs Malaysian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uganda
Malaysian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uganda
Malaysians
13.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
28.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
7.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uganda vs Malaysian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,969,010 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,983,571 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.162 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 3.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Uganda | Malaysian |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 39.4% | 38.2% |
| Range | 37.3% | 36.7% |
| Mean | 14.4% | 15.2% |
| Median | 12.9% | 14.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.5% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uganda and Malaysians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are Arab (13.7%, a difference of 0.010%), South American Indian (13.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from South America (13.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Delaware (13.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (13.8%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Panamanian (14.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Moroccan (14.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from the Azores (14.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (14.2%, a difference of 0.49%), and Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.72%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Delaware | 31.1 /100 | #194 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | South America | 30.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 13.7% |
| South American Indians | 28.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 13.7% |
| Arabs | 28.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 28.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 25.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.8% |
| Spanish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
| Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
| Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
| Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |