Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Welsh Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Welsh
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Welsh
8.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
95.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
99th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Welsh Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,739,253 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189 and weighted average of 8.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 525,428,616 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.656 and weighted average of 8.1%, a difference of 1.4%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Welsh |
Minimum | 1.8% | 4.7% |
Maximum | 15.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 13.8% | 95.3% |
Mean | 7.1% | 14.9% |
Median | 6.5% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 7.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 16.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 15.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 15.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Welsh by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Canadian (8.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from France (8.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Israel (8.2%, a difference of 0.34%), Taiwanese (8.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and South African (8.2%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Immigrants from South Africa (8.1%, a difference of 0.070%), New Zealander (8.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Norway (8.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Indonesia (8.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (8.1%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Slavs | 95.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Laotians | 95.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Egyptians | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 8.1% |
French Canadians | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Basques | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Jordanians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Romanians | 94.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Taiwanese | 94.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | France | 94.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Canadians | 94.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 93.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 8.2% |
South Africans | 93.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 8.2% |