Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Turkish Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Turkish
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Turks
8.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Turkish Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,739,253 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189 and weighted average of 8.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,236,955 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.375 and weighted average of 7.5%, a difference of 9.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Turkish |
Minimum | 1.8% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 15.6% | 18.7% |
Range | 13.8% | 16.3% |
Mean | 7.1% | 7.1% |
Median | 6.5% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 9.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 3.9% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Canadian (8.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from France (8.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Israel (8.2%, a difference of 0.34%), Taiwanese (8.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and South African (8.2%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
French Canadians | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Basques | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Jordanians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Romanians | 94.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Taiwanese | 94.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | France | 94.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Canadians | 94.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 93.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 8.2% |
South Africans | 93.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Russia | 93.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 8.2% |
French | 92.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 91.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Native Hawaiians | 91.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Greek (7.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Estonian (7.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Bolivian (7.5%, a difference of 0.41%), Carpatho Rusyn (7.5%, a difference of 0.47%), and Slovene (7.5%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Russians | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Turks | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Bolivians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Slovenes | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Scandinavians | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.1 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.6% |