Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Sierra Leonean Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Sierra Leonean
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Sierra Leoneans
12.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
78.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
73.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Sierra Leonean Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,161,655 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 12.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,419,123 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.482 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 0.37%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Sierra Leonean |
Minimum | 2.3% | 3.2% |
Maximum | 48.4% | 52.9% |
Range | 46.1% | 49.7% |
Mean | 16.1% | 14.5% |
Median | 12.7% | 12.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.3% | 16.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.8% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.6% | 9.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Sierra Leoneans by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Cuban (12.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from El Salvador (12.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Okinawan (12.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Uganda (12.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from France (12.6%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sierra Leoneans are Immigrants from Panama (12.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Yugoslavian (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Hungary (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Australian (12.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and Malaysian (12.6%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 82.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 81.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Austria | 81.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.5% |
Ukrainians | 80.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.6% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 80.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.6% |
Cubans | 79.9 /100 | #139 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 78.0 /100 | #140 | Good 12.6% |
Okinawans | 75.9 /100 | #141 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 75.9 /100 | #142 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #143 | Good 12.6% |
Hawaiians | 75.1 /100 | #144 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 75.0 /100 | #145 | Good 12.6% |
Native Hawaiians | 75.0 /100 | #146 | Good 12.6% |
Malaysians | 74.8 /100 | #147 | Good 12.6% |
Yugoslavians | 73.9 /100 | #148 | Good 12.6% |
Sierra Leoneans | 73.0 /100 | #149 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Panama | 72.1 /100 | #150 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.6% |
Australians | 71.4 /100 | #152 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 70.1 /100 | #153 | Good 12.7% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 68.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.7% |