Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Cuban Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Cuban
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Cubans
12.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
78.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
79.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Cuban Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,161,655 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 12.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 395,594,477 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.108 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 0.15%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Cuban |
Minimum | 2.3% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 48.4% | 35.9% |
Range | 46.1% | 33.4% |
Mean | 16.1% | 12.4% |
Median | 12.7% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.3% | 14.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.8% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.6% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Cubans by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Immigrants from El Salvador (12.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Okinawan (12.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Uganda (12.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from France (12.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and Ukrainian (12.6%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Immigrants from El Salvador (12.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Ukrainian (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (12.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Austria (12.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (12.5%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 85.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 84.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 83.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.5% |
Salvadorans | 83.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 83.4 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 82.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 81.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Austria | 81.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.5% |
Ukrainians | 80.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.6% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 80.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.6% |
Cubans | 79.9 /100 | #139 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 78.0 /100 | #140 | Good 12.6% |
Okinawans | 75.9 /100 | #141 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 75.9 /100 | #142 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #143 | Good 12.6% |
Hawaiians | 75.1 /100 | #144 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 75.0 /100 | #145 | Good 12.6% |
Native Hawaiians | 75.0 /100 | #146 | Good 12.6% |
Malaysians | 74.8 /100 | #147 | Good 12.6% |
Yugoslavians | 73.9 /100 | #148 | Good 12.6% |
Sierra Leoneans | 73.0 /100 | #149 | Good 12.6% |