Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Romanian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Romanian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Romanians
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
92.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
93.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Romanian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,776,371 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,566,833 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 0.63%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Romanian |
Minimum | 0.44% | 0.81% |
Maximum | 23.0% | 61.3% |
Range | 22.5% | 60.5% |
Mean | 8.4% | 14.8% |
Median | 8.3% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.2% | 16.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 10.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 14.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 14.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Romanians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are French Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Slavic (10.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Welsh (10.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.5%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from Egypt (10.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Finnish (10.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Indonesia (10.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Scottish (10.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from South Africa (10.4%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 94.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.4% |
British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Jordanians | 94.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Australians | 94.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |
French Canadians | 91.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Slavs | 91.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Canadians | 91.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Laotians | 91.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Portuguese | 91.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Albanians | 90.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.6% |