Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Denmark Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from Denmark
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from Denmark
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
92.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
MALE POVERTY
95.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Denmark Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,776,371 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,389,161 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.573 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 1.3%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Denmark |
Minimum | 0.44% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 23.0% | 40.2% |
Range | 22.5% | 36.2% |
Mean | 8.4% | 11.7% |
Median | 8.3% | 10.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 6.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.2% | 11.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 8.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Denmark by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are French Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Slavic (10.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Welsh (10.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Latvia (10.5%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Denmark are Cambodian (10.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Indian (Asian) (10.4%, a difference of 0.020%), British (10.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Northern European (10.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (10.4%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | England | 95.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 95.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Northern Europeans | 95.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Cambodians | 95.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 94.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.4% |
British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Jordanians | 94.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Australians | 94.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |
French Canadians | 91.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Slavs | 91.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Canadians | 91.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.5% |