Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Saudi Arabia Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Thailand
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Thailand
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
13.3%
POVERTY
3.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
218th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.8%
POVERTY
0.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
233rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Saudi Arabia Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,935,515 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.414 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,230,350 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.117 and weighted average of 13.8%, a difference of 3.2%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Thailand | Immigrants from Saudi Arabia |
Minimum | 2.0% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 71.4% | 37.0% |
Range | 69.4% | 33.7% |
Mean | 18.3% | 15.0% |
Median | 16.1% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.1% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.4% | 17.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.4% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.1% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.0% | 7.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (13.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Japanese (13.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Nonimmigrants (13.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Cambodia (13.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and American (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia are Immigrants from Laos (13.8%, a difference of 0.24%), Fijian (13.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Cuban (13.9%, a difference of 0.68%), Nigerian (13.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Alaskan Athabascan (13.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Japanese | 3.3 /100 | #215 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 3.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 13.4% |
Americans | 2.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 13.4% |
Alsatians | 2.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.6 /100 | #222 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.4% |
German Russians | 2.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 13.4% |
Marshallese | 2.2 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.4% |
Alaska Natives | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.5% |
Osage | 1.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 1.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.6% |
Nigerians | 1.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.6% |
Fijians | 0.8 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.7% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.8 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.8% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.8% |
Cubans | 0.6 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.9% |