Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from the Azores Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Thailand
Immigrants from the Azores
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Thailand
Immigrants from the Azores
13.3%
POVERTY
3.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
218th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
POVERTY
6.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from the Azores Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,935,515 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.414 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,256,915 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.482 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 1.5%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Thailand | Immigrants from the Azores |
Minimum | 2.0% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 71.4% | 24.6% |
Range | 69.4% | 22.8% |
Mean | 18.3% | 11.0% |
Median | 16.1% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.1% | 7.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.4% | 14.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.4% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.1% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.0% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from the Azores by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (13.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Japanese (13.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Nonimmigrants (13.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Cambodia (13.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and American (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from the Azores are Malaysian (13.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Ugandan (13.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Panamanian (13.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (13.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Moroccan (13.2%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 14.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 12.9% |
Tsimshian | 9.2 /100 | #205 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 7.0 /100 | #206 | Tragic 13.1% |
Panamanians | 6.6 /100 | #207 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ugandans | 6.2 /100 | #208 | Tragic 13.1% |
Malaysians | 6.1 /100 | #209 | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 6.1 /100 | #210 | Tragic 13.1% |
Moroccans | 5.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.1 /100 | #213 | Tragic 13.3% |
Bermudans | 3.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 13.3% |
Japanese | 3.3 /100 | #215 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 3.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 13.4% |
Americans | 2.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 13.4% |
Alsatians | 2.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.6 /100 | #222 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.4% |