Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Egyptian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Egyptian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Egyptians
18.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Egyptian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,613,920 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.423 and weighted average of 18.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 273,693,794 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.582 and weighted average of 19.1%, a difference of 2.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Sri Lanka | Egyptian |
Minimum | 4.4% | 11.6% |
Maximum | 59.4% | 52.0% |
Range | 55.0% | 40.4% |
Mean | 20.8% | 20.8% |
Median | 17.7% | 18.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.4% | 16.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.6% | 22.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.3% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.0% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.0% | 8.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Egyptians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Immigrants from Philippines (18.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Korean (18.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Japan (18.6%, a difference of 0.30%), Turkish (18.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Armenia (18.7%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Immigrants from Italy (19.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (19.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Argentina (19.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and Latvian (19.0%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |