Immigrants from Armenia vs Egyptian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Armenia
Egyptian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Armenia
Egyptians
18.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Armenia vs Egyptian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,216,113 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Armenia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103 and weighted average of 18.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 273,693,794 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.582 and weighted average of 19.1%, a difference of 2.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Armenia | Egyptian |
Minimum | 3.3% | 11.6% |
Maximum | 48.3% | 52.0% |
Range | 45.0% | 40.4% |
Mean | 18.8% | 20.8% |
Median | 16.9% | 18.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.1% | 16.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.2% | 22.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.0% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 8.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Armenia and Egyptians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Armenia are Turkish (18.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Japan (18.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Korean (18.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Tongan (18.8%, a difference of 0.66%), and Bulgarian (18.8%, a difference of 0.69%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Immigrants from Italy (19.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (19.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Argentina (19.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and Tsimshian (19.1%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |