Immigrants from Serbia vs Chinese Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Serbia
Chinese
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Serbia
Chinese
4.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Serbia vs Chinese Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,455,984 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.014 and weighted average of 4.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,670,469 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 3.6%, a difference of 21.8%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Serbia | Chinese |
Minimum | 0.78% | 0.44% |
Maximum | 13.7% | 17.1% |
Range | 12.9% | 16.7% |
Mean | 4.0% | 4.2% |
Median | 3.6% | 3.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.7% | 4.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Serbia by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Serbia are Immigrants from Canada (4.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Slavic (4.4%, a difference of 0.060%), New Zealander (4.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Macedonian (4.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Korea (4.5%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Tlingit-Haida | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Slavs | 99.4 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 4.4% |
New Zealanders | 99.4 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | North America | 99.3 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | England | 99.3 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Ukrainians | 99.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (3.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 5.6%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 6.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |