Immigrants from Belize vs Chinese Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belize
Chinese
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Belize
Chinese
6.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
300th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belize vs Chinese Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,147,118 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belize and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.099 and weighted average of 6.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,670,469 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 3.6%, a difference of 83.7%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Belize | Chinese |
Minimum | 0.90% | 0.44% |
Maximum | 16.5% | 17.1% |
Range | 15.6% | 16.7% |
Mean | 7.4% | 4.2% |
Median | 6.7% | 3.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.2% | 4.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belize by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belize are Nicaraguan (6.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Central American (6.7%, a difference of 0.60%), Immigrants from Guyana (6.7%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Ecuador (6.7%, a difference of 0.74%), and Kiowa (6.6%, a difference of 0.76%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.6% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.6% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.6% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.7% |
Nicaraguans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.7% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 6.8% |
Cubans | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 6.8% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.0% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (3.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 5.6%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 6.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |