Immigrants from Philippines vs Chilean Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,939,679 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.027 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 255,436,750 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 3.3%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Philippines	Chilean
Minimum	0.63%	1.1%
Maximum	15.8%	14.3%
Range	15.2%	13.2%
Mean	4.9%	5.3%
Median	4.6%	4.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.5%	3.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	5.3%	6.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	1.8%	3.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.5%	3.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.5%	2.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Philippines and Chileans by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (4.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (4.8%, a difference of 0.69%), Indian (Asian) (4.8%, a difference of 0.79%), White/Caucasian (4.8%, a difference of 0.83%), and Jordanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.85%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Guamanian/Chamorro (4.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Hungary (4.9%, a difference of 0.75%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (4.9%, a difference of 0.97%), Immigrants from Kenya (4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and Samoan (4.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| Philippines	94.6 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	94.0 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	93.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 4.8%
Indians (Asian)	93.2 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 4.8%
Whites/Caucasians	93.1 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 4.8%
Jordanians	93.1 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 4.8%
Romanians	92.5 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	92.5 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Asia	92.3 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 4.8%
Egyptians	92.0 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 4.8%
Palestinians	91.2 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 4.9%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	90.7 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 4.9%
Soviet Union	90.7 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 4.9%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	90.5 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 4.9%
Puget Sound Salish	90.4 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 4.9%
Immigrants \| Kenya	90.2 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 4.9%
Samoans	90.2 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 4.9%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	89.4 /100 \| #135	Excellent 4.9%
Immigrants \| Hungary	88.7 /100 \| #136	Excellent 4.9%
Guamanians/Chamorros	86.5 /100 \| #137	Excellent 4.9%
Chileans	86.0 /100 \| #138	Excellent 4.9%