Central American vs Chilean Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Central American
Chilean
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Central Americans
Chileans
6.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
301st/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
86.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American vs Chilean Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 497,895,847 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.482 and weighted average of 6.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 255,436,750 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 36.3%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Central American | Chilean |
Minimum | 2.1% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 41.9% | 14.3% |
Range | 39.8% | 13.2% |
Mean | 9.7% | 5.3% |
Median | 7.9% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.8% | 6.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 2.9% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Central Americans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Ecuador (6.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from El Salvador (6.8%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Belize (6.7%, a difference of 0.60%), Nicaraguan (6.7%, a difference of 0.75%), and Cuban (6.8%, a difference of 0.86%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.6% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.6% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.7% |
Nicaraguans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.7% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 6.8% |
Cubans | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 6.8% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.0% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.0% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Guamanian/Chamorro (4.9%, a difference of 0.13%), German Russian (5.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Portugal (5.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Brazil (5.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from China (5.0%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 90.5 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.4 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 90.2 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Samoans | 90.2 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 89.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 4.9% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #136 | Excellent 4.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 86.5 /100 | #137 | Excellent 4.9% |
Chileans | 86.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 4.9% |
German Russians | 85.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 84.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |