Immigrants from Malaysia vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Malaysia
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Malaysia
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
80.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,903,089 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.095 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,692,358 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.067 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 18.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Malaysia | Trinidadian and Tobagonian |
| Minimum | 3.4% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 49.6% | 32.1% |
| Range | 46.2% | 30.1% |
| Mean | 12.6% | 14.8% |
| Median | 11.6% | 13.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.3% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 5.4% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Icelander (13.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Syrian (13.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Liberian (15.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Ottawa (15.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (15.4%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (15.4%, a difference of 0.53%), and Jamaican (15.5%, a difference of 0.61%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |