Immigrants from Malaysia vs Argentinean Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Malaysia
Argentinean
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Malaysia
Argentineans
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
80.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
89.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Argentinean Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,903,089 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.095 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 296,942,880 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.270 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 1.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Malaysia | Argentinean |
| Minimum | 3.4% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 49.6% | 23.9% |
| Range | 46.2% | 22.4% |
| Mean | 12.6% | 10.5% |
| Median | 11.6% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.3% | 13.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia and Argentineans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Icelander (13.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Pakistani (12.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Basque (12.9%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Immigrants from Norway (12.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.070%), South African (12.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Belarus (12.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Brazil (12.8%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
| South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
| French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |