Immigrants from Kenya vs Alsatian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Kenya
Alsatian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Kenya
Alsatians
13.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
21.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
201st/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
220th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Kenya vs Alsatian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,949,834 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kenya and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.035 and weighted average of 13.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,678,421 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.286 and weighted average of 14.5%, a difference of 4.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Kenya | Alsatian |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 37.4% | 23.1% |
| Range | 35.3% | 19.7% |
| Mean | 14.4% | 11.5% |
| Median | 14.1% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.5% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 13.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Kenya and Alsatians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kenya are Hmong (13.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Spanish (13.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Western Asia (13.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Spaniard (13.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and Ugandan (14.0%, a difference of 0.90%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Spanish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
| Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
| Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
| Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |