Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Alsatian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eastern Africa
Alsatian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Eastern Africa
Alsatians
14.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
9.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
220th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Alsatian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 354,843,710 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Africa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531 and weighted average of 14.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,678,421 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.286 and weighted average of 14.5%, a difference of 2.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Eastern Africa | Alsatian |
Minimum | 0.38% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 56.1% | 23.1% |
Range | 55.7% | 19.7% |
Mean | 17.0% | 11.5% |
Median | 13.9% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.2% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.2% | 13.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Alsatians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Africa are Immigrants from the Azores (14.2%, a difference of 0.34%), Panamanian (14.2%, a difference of 0.41%), Malaysian (14.3%, a difference of 0.49%), Moroccan (14.3%, a difference of 0.58%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (14.0%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Cambodia (14.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Nonimmigrants (14.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |