Immigrants from Israel vs South African Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
South African
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
South Africans
11.7%
POVERTY
87.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
POVERTY
87.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs South African Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,974,563 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.005 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,558,592 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.854 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 0.090%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | South African |
Minimum | 0.47% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 37.3% | 54.5% |
Range | 36.8% | 53.2% |
Mean | 10.3% | 10.7% |
Median | 9.7% | 8.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 3.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 11.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 11.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 10.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel and South Africans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Immigrants from Argentina (11.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Norway (11.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Brazil (11.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Ukraine (11.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Soviet Union (11.7%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Ukraine (11.8%, a difference of 0.090%), French (11.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Argentina (11.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Norway (11.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Brazil (11.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 89.0 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.9 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.7% |
New Zealanders | 88.7 /100 | #121 | Excellent 11.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 11.7% |
Soviet Union | 88.4 /100 | #124 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 88.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 88.0 /100 | #126 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.0 /100 | #127 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Israel | 87.4 /100 | #128 | Excellent 11.7% |
South Africans | 87.0 /100 | #129 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 11.8% |
French | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.8% |
Peruvians | 85.6 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 85.2 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.8% |
Yugoslavians | 85.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 85.2 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.8% |
Chileans | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 83.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 82.4 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.9% |