Immigrants from Israel vs New Zealander Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
New Zealander
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
New Zealanders
11.7%
POVERTY
87.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
POVERTY
88.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs New Zealander Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,974,563 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.005 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,895,719 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.148 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 0.31%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | New Zealander |
Minimum | 0.47% | 0.99% |
Maximum | 37.3% | 21.4% |
Range | 36.8% | 20.4% |
Mean | 10.3% | 9.7% |
Median | 9.7% | 9.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 12.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel and New Zealanders by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are South African (11.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Argentina (11.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Norway (11.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Brazil (11.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Ukraine (11.8%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Puget Sound Salish (11.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Hungary (11.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (11.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Tlingit-Haida (11.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Soviet Union (11.7%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
Sri Lankans | 89.4 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 89.0 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.9 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.7% |
New Zealanders | 88.7 /100 | #121 | Excellent 11.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 11.7% |
Soviet Union | 88.4 /100 | #124 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 88.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 88.0 /100 | #126 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.0 /100 | #127 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Israel | 87.4 /100 | #128 | Excellent 11.7% |
South Africans | 87.0 /100 | #129 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 11.8% |
French | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.8% |
Peruvians | 85.6 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 85.2 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.8% |
Yugoslavians | 85.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.8% |