Immigrants from Chile vs Icelander Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Icelander
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Icelanders
11.1%
MALE POVERTY
57.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
68.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Icelander Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,566,097 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.316 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,599,836 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 1.2%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Icelander |
| Minimum | 0.80% | 0.64% |
| Maximum | 36.4% | 57.1% |
| Range | 35.6% | 56.5% |
| Mean | 11.6% | 12.2% |
| Median | 10.2% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.8% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 8.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 10.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 9.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Icelanders by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are White/Caucasian (11.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Ethiopian (11.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (11.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Soviet Union (11.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and Taiwanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Armenian (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Venezuela (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Guamanian/Chamorro (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Venezuelan (11.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Nepal (11.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
| Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
| Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
| Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
| Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
| Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
| Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
| Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 59.7 /100 | #161 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #162 | Average 11.1% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 56.7 /100 | #163 | Average 11.1% |
| Ethiopians | 56.7 /100 | #164 | Average 11.1% |