Brazilian vs Icelander Male Poverty
COMPARE
Brazilian
Icelander
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Brazilians
Icelanders
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
82.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
68.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Icelander Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,645,938 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.024 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,599,836 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 2.0%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Brazilian | Icelander |
Minimum | 2.2% | 0.64% |
Maximum | 32.6% | 57.1% |
Range | 30.4% | 56.5% |
Mean | 10.3% | 12.2% |
Median | 10.0% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 15.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 10.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 9.8% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Icelanders by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are New Zealander (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Pakistani (10.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Vietnam (10.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Belarus (10.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Israel (10.8%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Armenian (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Venezuela (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Guamanian/Chamorro (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Venezuelan (11.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and Syrian (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |