Immigrants from Australia vs Bhutanese Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,813,318 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.370 and weighted average of 4.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 450,291,687 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217 and weighted average of 4.1%, a difference of 7.0%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Australia	Bhutanese
Minimum	1.3%	0.54%
Maximum	23.4%	49.5%
Range	22.1%	48.9%
Mean	6.0%	5.1%
Median	4.3%	3.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.2%	2.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	6.0%	5.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.8%	3.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.4%	6.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.3%	6.7%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Okinawan (4.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Tlingit-Haida (4.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Sweden (4.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (4.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and Czechoslovakian (4.4%, a difference of 0.74%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
French	99.7 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	99.7 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	99.7 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 4.3%
Czechoslovakians	99.7 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Sweden	99.6 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 4.4%
Tlingit-Haida	99.6 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 4.4%
Okinawans	99.6 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Australia	99.6 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.6 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	99.5 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 4.4%
Macedonians	99.4 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Serbia	99.4 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Canada	99.4 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 4.4%
Slavs	99.4 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 4.4%
New Zealanders	99.4 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 4.4%

Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Singapore (4.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Eastern European (4.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Zimbabwean (4.1%, a difference of 0.39%), Maltese (4.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Ireland (4.1%, a difference of 0.66%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Germans	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 4.0%
Filipinos	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 4.0%
Italians	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 4.0%
Immigrants \| Ireland	99.9 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 4.1%
Maltese	99.9 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 4.1%
Zimbabweans	99.9 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 4.1%
Immigrants \| Singapore	99.9 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 4.1%
Bhutanese	99.9 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 4.1%
Eastern Europeans	99.9 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 4.1%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	99.9 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 4.1%
Cypriots	99.9 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 4.1%
Danes	99.9 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 4.1%
Scandinavians	99.9 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 4.1%
Immigrants \| Scotland	99.9 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 4.2%
Finns	99.9 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 4.2%