Immigrants from Australia vs Bhutanese Single Mother Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Australia
Bhutanese
Single Mother Households
Single Mother Households Comparison
Immigrants from Australia
Bhutanese
5.1%
SINGLE MOTHER HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.3%
SINGLE MOTHER HOUSEHOLDS
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Australia vs Bhutanese Single Mother Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,768,478 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of single mother households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.631 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,820,628 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of single mother households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.156 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 3.6%.
Single Mother Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Australia | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 0.54% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 22.6% | 12.1% |
Range | 22.0% | 11.1% |
Mean | 6.0% | 4.8% |
Median | 5.0% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.3% | 5.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia and Bhutanese by Single Mother Households
In terms of single mother households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Indian (Asian) (5.1%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from India (5.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Cypriot (5.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and Soviet Union (5.1%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Russian (5.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Latvian (5.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Burmese (5.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Lithuania (5.3%, a difference of 0.51%), and Immigrants from Japan (5.2%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Households |
Immigrants | Israel | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | China | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | India | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Soviet Union | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Chinese | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Thais | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Armenians | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.7 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.3% |