Icelander vs South African Female Poverty
COMPARE
Icelander
South African
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Icelanders
South Africans
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
81.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
88.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Icelander vs South African Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,608,280 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,540,648 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.636 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 1.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Icelander | South African |
Minimum | 0.47% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 33.3% | 44.9% |
Range | 32.9% | 42.4% |
Mean | 11.8% | 10.8% |
Median | 10.4% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.1% | 13.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.9% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders and South Africans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Malaysia (13.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Pakistani (12.9%, a difference of 0.32%), and Basque (12.9%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Belarus (12.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Brazil (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Argentinean (12.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Norway (12.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |