Icelander vs French Canadian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Icelander
French Canadian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Icelanders
French Canadians
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
81.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
90.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Icelander vs French Canadian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,608,280 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,012,927 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.522 and weighted average of 12.7%, a difference of 1.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Icelander | French Canadian |
| Minimum | 0.47% | 4.4% |
| Maximum | 33.3% | 49.1% |
| Range | 32.9% | 44.7% |
| Mean | 11.8% | 16.1% |
| Median | 10.4% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.1% | 17.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.9% | 8.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 8.2% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders and French Canadians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Pakistani (12.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Basque (12.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from France (12.9%, a difference of 0.43%), Chilean (12.9%, a difference of 0.65%), and Peruvian (12.9%, a difference of 0.74%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to French Canadians are Immigrants from Hungary (12.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (12.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Norway (12.8%, a difference of 0.24%), Argentinean (12.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
| South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
| French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |