Ecuadorian vs Tsimshian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Tsimshian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Ecuadorians
Tsimshian
12.7%
MALE POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
238th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Tsimshian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,549,368 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,624,889 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.352 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 0.95%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ecuadorian | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 0.81% | 8.5% |
| Maximum | 27.8% | 21.8% |
| Range | 27.0% | 13.2% |
| Mean | 12.3% | 13.7% |
| Median | 11.6% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.3% | 16.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians and Tsimshian by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Ghanaian (12.7%, a difference of 0.0%), French American Indian (12.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (12.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (12.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Laos (12.6%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Liberian (12.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Alaskan Athabascan (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Nepalese (12.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Sudanese (12.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (12.8%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Salvadorans | 0.6 /100 | #231 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.6 /100 | #232 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Fijians | 0.6 /100 | #233 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.4 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.7% |
| French American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Ghanaians | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |