Alaska Native vs Tsimshian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Alaska Native
Tsimshian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Alaska Natives
Tsimshian
12.4%
MALE POVERTY
1.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
227th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaska Native vs Tsimshian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,750,766 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.051 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,624,889 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.352 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 3.6%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaska Native | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 0.96% | 8.5% |
| Maximum | 52.4% | 21.8% |
| Range | 51.4% | 13.2% |
| Mean | 18.0% | 13.7% |
| Median | 14.0% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.6% | 16.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.8% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.9% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Alaska Natives and Tsimshian by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alaska Natives are Alsatian (12.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Nigerian (12.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Cuban (12.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Osage (12.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and Marshallese (12.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Liberian (12.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Alaskan Athabascan (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Nepalese (12.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Sudanese (12.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (12.7%, a difference of 0.67%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Osage | 1.5 /100 | #225 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Nigerians | 1.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.4 /100 | #227 | Tragic 12.4% |
| Alsatians | 1.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 12.4% |
| Cubans | 1.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 12.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 12.5% |
| Salvadorans | 0.6 /100 | #231 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.6 /100 | #232 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Fijians | 0.6 /100 | #233 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.4 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.7% |
| French American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Ghanaians | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |