Danish vs Cypriot Family Poverty
COMPARE
Danish
Cypriot
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Danes
Cypriots
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Danish vs Cypriot Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,902,124 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.386 and weighted average of 7.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,784,976 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Cypriots and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.373 and weighted average of 7.3%, a difference of 0.56%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Danish | Cypriot |
Minimum | 2.7% | 0.41% |
Maximum | 36.6% | 14.8% |
Range | 33.8% | 14.4% |
Mean | 8.5% | 5.8% |
Median | 6.8% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 7.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Danes and Cypriots by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (7.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Croatian (7.3%, a difference of 0.31%), Burmese (7.3%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Iran (7.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Scotland (7.3%, a difference of 0.58%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cypriots are Immigrants from Scotland (7.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Burmese (7.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Croatian (7.3%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Korea (7.4%, a difference of 0.40%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (7.3%, a difference of 0.55%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Russians | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.5% |