Danish vs Croatian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Danish
Croatian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Danes
Croatians
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Danish vs Croatian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,902,124 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.386 and weighted average of 7.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 374,582,342 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.422 and weighted average of 7.3%, a difference of 0.31%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Danish | Croatian |
Minimum | 2.7% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 36.6% | 28.1% |
Range | 33.8% | 26.3% |
Mean | 8.5% | 8.9% |
Median | 6.8% | 6.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 10.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Danes and Croatians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (7.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Burmese (7.3%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Iran (7.3%, a difference of 0.44%), Cypriot (7.3%, a difference of 0.56%), and Immigrants from Scotland (7.3%, a difference of 0.58%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Burmese (7.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Cypriot (7.3%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Scotland (7.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (7.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Korea (7.4%, a difference of 0.65%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.4% |