Czech vs Swedish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Czech
Swedish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Czechs
Swedes
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
41st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Swedish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,224,691 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.229 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 538,313,222 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.507 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 2.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czech | Swedish |
Minimum | 1.4% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 31.4% | 66.7% |
Range | 29.9% | 63.3% |
Mean | 10.5% | 13.6% |
Median | 10.6% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 13.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 11.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Swedes by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Macedonian (11.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Poland (11.8%, a difference of 0.23%), Russian (11.8%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Greece (11.8%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (11.8%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Italian (11.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Burmese (11.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Luxembourger (11.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and Croatian (11.6%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Cypriots | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Russians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |