Czech vs Swedish Family Poverty
COMPARE
Czech
Swedish
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Czechs
Swedes
7.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Swedish Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,390,324 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.112 and weighted average of 7.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 535,382,987 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.589 and weighted average of 7.1%, a difference of 4.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | Swedish |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 25.0% | 81.3% |
| Range | 23.4% | 79.6% |
| Mean | 7.4% | 10.7% |
| Median | 6.6% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 14.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 14.5% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Swedes by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Italian (7.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Polish (7.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (7.4%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Korea (7.4%, a difference of 0.58%), and Immigrants from Scotland (7.3%, a difference of 0.97%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Iranian (7.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Maltese (7.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Lithuanian (7.2%, a difference of 0.88%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (7.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and Luxembourger (7.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |