Czech vs British West Indian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Czech
British West Indian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Czechs
British West Indians
13.5%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
1.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
248th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
3.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs British West Indian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 410,747,171 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 13.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,852,012 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 1.3%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czech | British West Indian |
Minimum | 7.7% | 3.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 38.5% |
Range | 92.3% | 35.3% |
Mean | 33.2% | 14.6% |
Median | 22.4% | 13.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.1% | 11.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 43.3% | 17.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 28.3% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 27.1% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.9% | 7.2% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and British West Indians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Belgian (13.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Micronesia (13.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Spanish (13.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Somalia (13.6%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Luxembourger (13.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ghana (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Bangladeshi (13.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Czechoslovakian (13.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and British (13.3%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.3% |
British | 4.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.3% |
Canadians | 4.0 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.3% |
Bangladeshis | 3.7 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.3% |
Luxembourgers | 3.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.4% |
British West Indians | 3.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 3.0 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.4% |
Belizeans | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Germany | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 13.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 2.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 13.4% |
Barbadians | 2.1 /100 | #243 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 1.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 1.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 1.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 13.5% |
Belgians | 1.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 13.5% |
Czechs | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 13.5% |
Spanish | 1.0 /100 | #249 | Tragic 13.6% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 1.0 /100 | #250 | Tragic 13.6% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.9 /100 | #251 | Tragic 13.6% |
Finns | 0.9 /100 | #252 | Tragic 13.6% |