Czech vs Bangladeshi Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Czech
Bangladeshi
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Czechs
Bangladeshis
13.5%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
1.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
248th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
3.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
235th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Bangladeshi Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 410,747,171 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 13.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 134,113,248 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.526 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 1.5%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | Bangladeshi |
| Minimum | 7.7% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 40.0% |
| Range | 92.3% | 38.7% |
| Mean | 33.2% | 14.5% |
| Median | 22.4% | 14.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.1% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 43.3% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 28.3% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 27.1% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.9% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Bangladeshis by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Belgian (13.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Micronesia (13.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Spanish (13.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Somalia (13.6%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Luxembourger (13.4%, a difference of 0.050%), British (13.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Canadian (13.3%, a difference of 0.10%), British West Indian (13.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Ghana (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Slavs | 5.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.3% |
| British | 4.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Canadians | 4.0 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 3.7 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Luxembourgers | 3.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.4% |
| British West Indians | 3.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 3.0 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Belizeans | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 2.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Barbadians | 2.1 /100 | #243 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 1.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 1.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 1.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Belgians | 1.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Czechs | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Spanish | 1.0 /100 | #249 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 1.0 /100 | #250 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.9 /100 | #251 | Tragic 13.6% |