Czechoslovakian vs Tlingit-Haida Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Tlingit-Haida
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Tlingit-Haida
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
91.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.9%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
94.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Tlingit-Haida Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 364,841,807 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.390 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,748,719 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195 and weighted average of 14.9%, a difference of 1.5%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Tlingit-Haida |
Minimum | 3.0% | 0.72% |
Maximum | 62.5% | 40.0% |
Range | 59.5% | 39.3% |
Mean | 22.0% | 17.4% |
Median | 18.6% | 16.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.7% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.6% | 25.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.9% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.3% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.1% | 9.6% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Tlingit-Haida by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Palestinian (15.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Portuguese (15.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Pakistani (15.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and South African (15.0%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Jordanian (14.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Chilean (14.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Serbian (14.8%, a difference of 0.22%), English (14.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Denmark (14.9%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Serbians | 94.5 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Chileans | 94.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 94.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 14.9% |
English | 93.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 93.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Irish | 93.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Belgians | 93.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Sri Lankans | 93.2 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 93.1 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 93.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 92.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Scottish | 92.3 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.0% |
South Africans | 92.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Pakistanis | 91.7 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Czechoslovakians | 91.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Palestinians | 90.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Portuguese | 90.6 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.1% |