Czechoslovakian vs Basque Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Basque
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Basques
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
91.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
94.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Basque Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 364,841,807 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.390 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,163,292 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Basques and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.344 and weighted average of 14.8%, a difference of 1.8%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Basque |
Minimum | 3.0% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 62.5% | 54.6% |
Range | 59.5% | 53.4% |
Mean | 22.0% | 16.3% |
Median | 18.6% | 13.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.7% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.6% | 21.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.9% | 11.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.3% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.1% | 10.6% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Basques by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Pakistani (15.0%, a difference of 0.25%), South African (15.0%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and Scottish (15.0%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Basques are Immigrants from England (14.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Serbian (14.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Chilean (14.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Jordanian (14.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and Tlingit-Haida (14.9%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | England | 94.8 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Basques | 94.7 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Serbians | 94.5 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Chileans | 94.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 94.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 14.9% |
English | 93.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 93.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Irish | 93.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Belgians | 93.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Sri Lankans | 93.2 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 93.1 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 93.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 92.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Scottish | 92.3 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.0% |
South Africans | 92.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Pakistanis | 91.7 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Czechoslovakians | 91.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.1% |