Creek vs Yugoslavian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Creek
Yugoslavian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Creek
Yugoslavians
16.8%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
73.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Yugoslavian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,159,894 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.462 and weighted average of 16.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 258,600,754 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.024 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 33.4%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Creek | Yugoslavian |
Minimum | 4.0% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 66.7% |
Range | 96.0% | 64.4% |
Mean | 25.8% | 15.4% |
Median | 20.6% | 12.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.5% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.3% | 17.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.9% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.0% | 12.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.9% | 12.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Creek by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Immigrants from Yemen (16.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Choctaw (17.0%, a difference of 0.83%), Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 1.0%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 2.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Malaysian (12.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Lebanon (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Native Hawaiian (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Sierra Leonean (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and Hawaiian (12.6%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Okinawans | 75.9 /100 | #141 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 75.9 /100 | #142 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #143 | Good 12.6% |
Hawaiians | 75.1 /100 | #144 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 75.0 /100 | #145 | Good 12.6% |
Native Hawaiians | 75.0 /100 | #146 | Good 12.6% |
Malaysians | 74.8 /100 | #147 | Good 12.6% |
Yugoslavians | 73.9 /100 | #148 | Good 12.6% |
Sierra Leoneans | 73.0 /100 | #149 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Panama | 72.1 /100 | #150 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.6% |
Australians | 71.4 /100 | #152 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 70.1 /100 | #153 | Good 12.7% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 68.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.7% |
Immigrants | Spain | 68.7 /100 | #155 | Good 12.7% |