Creek vs Immigrants from Yemen Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Creek
Immigrants from Yemen
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Creek
Immigrants from Yemen
16.8%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.9%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
324th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Immigrants from Yemen Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,159,894 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.462 and weighted average of 16.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,158,341 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Yemen and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.200 and weighted average of 16.9%, a difference of 0.11%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Creek | Immigrants from Yemen |
Minimum | 4.0% | 4.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 32.4% |
Range | 96.0% | 27.7% |
Mean | 25.8% | 18.0% |
Median | 20.6% | 18.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.5% | 12.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.3% | 23.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.9% | 11.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.0% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.9% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Creek and Immigrants from Yemen by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (17.0%, a difference of 0.83%), Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 1.0%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 2.3%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and Central American Indian (17.2%, a difference of 2.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Yemen are Choctaw (17.0%, a difference of 0.72%), Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 1.1%), Central American Indian (17.2%, a difference of 2.3%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 2.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.3% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.6% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 20.0% |