Chinese vs Polish Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Chinese
Polish
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Chinese
Poles
9.8%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
63rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.0%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Polish Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,766,872 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 9.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 556,985,146 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.220 and weighted average of 10.0%, a difference of 2.1%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Polish |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 34.0% | 69.7% |
| Range | 32.5% | 68.4% |
| Mean | 11.5% | 13.0% |
| Median | 9.5% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.1% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 11.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 11.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Poles by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Bulgaria (9.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from North America (9.8%, a difference of 0.090%), English (9.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Turkey (9.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Slovene (9.8%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Laotian (10.0%, a difference of 0.080%), South African (10.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from England (10.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Croatia (10.0%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| English | 99.2 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.2 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Chinese | 99.2 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | North America | 99.2 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.1 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Slovenes | 99.1 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.0 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.0 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Italians | 99.0 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Scottish | 98.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 98.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Macedonians | 98.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| New Zealanders | 98.8 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 98.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| South Africans | 98.7 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Laotians | 98.7 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Poles | 98.6 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 98.6 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.0% |