Chinese vs Polish No Schooling Completed
COMPARE
Chinese
Polish
No Schooling Completed
No Schooling Completed Comparison
Chinese
Poles
1.5%
NO SCHOOLING COMPLETED
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.4%
NO SCHOOLING COMPLETED
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Polish No Schooling Completed Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,531,891 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with no schooling in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.007 and weighted average of 1.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 543,036,846 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of population with no schooling in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 1.4%, a difference of 2.5%.
No Schooling Completed Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Polish |
Minimum | 0.048% | 0.16% |
Maximum | 4.4% | 6.2% |
Range | 4.3% | 6.1% |
Mean | 1.2% | 1.3% |
Median | 1.2% | 1.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.65% | 1.00% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.5% | 1.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.90% | 0.39% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.79% | 0.74% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.78% | 0.74% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Poles by No Schooling Completed
In terms of no schooling completed, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Alaska Native (1.5%, a difference of 0.090%), European (1.5%, a difference of 0.34%), Welsh (1.5%, a difference of 0.37%), Alaskan Athabascan (1.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and Danish (1.5%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Irish (1.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Lithuanian (1.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Dutch (1.4%, a difference of 0.89%), Scotch-Irish (1.5%, a difference of 0.94%), and Tlingit-Haida (1.5%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Schooling Completed |
English | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 1.4% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 1.4% |
Scottish | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 1.4% |
Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 1.4% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 1.4% |
Irish | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 1.4% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 1.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 1.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 1.5% |
Finns | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 1.5% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 1.5% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 1.5% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 1.5% |
Welsh | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 1.5% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 1.5% |
Alaska Natives | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 1.5% |
Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 1.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 1.5% |
French | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 1.5% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 1.5% |
Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 1.5% |